You read the wrong paper, the gravity one. You can't count. I said
paper #1 and you read #2. But you did get to Fig. 7. Did you skim over
"the cause of gravity" on page 1?
The reason for the nullity of the MM experiment is exactly as I showed
in the diagram, and it's the same as in relativity using (ict x y z)
except everyone seems too dull to notice:
Upstream it's ic + v
Dnstream it's ic - v
c and v are always at right angles and the hypotenuse of such a sum is
the same either way. Therefore, no fringes.
I have already pointed out that the reason for having this inane
metric tensor with -1 1 1 1 is to disguise ict into just another
dimension, ct. And it is a big lie. Time can't be mixed with x y z,
and lot of people are starting to take notice.
Everyone is so ga-ga about the metric tensor that they haven't taken
the time to notice that it isn't a tensor at all. It's an arranged
matrix. It cannot tolerate a similarity transform.
Or maybe you can explain it to me.
John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net
