T
The Real Bev
Don't forget what I said upthread: even a full URL can lead to bad
things![]()
Like this one: http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/
Don't forget what I said upthread: even a full URL can lead to bad
things![]()
Like this one: http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/
You needn't trust - it's trivially easy to verify.
Of course, what you get is an expanded URL, just like the one you would
have seen in the absence of a tiny URL. But you still have to figure
out whether to trust the long version.
Basically, your remark was silly...
How do you know someone won't change the redirect afterwards? Of
course, any domain could be poisoned/redirected/sold, but isn't it
less likely for a google than some effing LIBYAN domain‽
For those who missed it, slashdot started displaying the domain name
next to links in comments because of link abuse.
How do you know someone won't change the redirect afterwards? Â Of
course, any domain could be poisoned/redirected/sold, but isn't it
less likely for a google than some effing LIBYAN domain‽
So stick to tinyURL, install some heavy duty AV software, and buy or
make a tinfoil hat.[1]
For those who missed it, slashdot started displaying the domain name
next to links in comments because of link abuse.
jg
[1] Not sure how sarcastic I am really feeling (it's non-zero), but at
least I should thank you for the chance to generate the above remark
![]()
On 4/20/2012, John David Galt posted:
Example: here's the tinyURL of your long link:
No one in his right mind trusts URL shorteners, no matter who sent them.
You needn't trust - it's trivially easy to verify.
Of course, what you get is an expanded URL, just like the one you would
have seen in the absence of a tiny URL. But you still have to figure
out whether to trust the long version.
Basically, your remark was silly...
--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
How do you know someone won't change the redirect afterwards? Â Of
course, any domain could be poisoned/redirected/sold, but isn't it
less likely for a google than some effing LIBYAN domain‽
So stick to tinyURL, install some heavy duty AV software, and buy or
make a tinfoil hat.[1]
For those who missed it, slashdot started displaying the domain name
next to links in comments because of link abuse.
jg
[1] Not sure how sarcastic I am really feeling (it's non-zero), but at
least I should thank you for the chance to generate the above remark
![]()
'sOK, glad to be stimulating, Shirley. Copper mesh works better, btw.
I was pulled over for a different offense and warned
about the GPS.
It's an idiotic law, that I can't find in any other state
than in the RepubliK of Kalifornia.
It's an idiotic law, that I can't find in any other state
than in the RepubliK of Kalifornia.
In "Hank J."
Minnesota used to have one, but it was changed in 2009, adding this
exception:
(iv) global positioning systems or navigation systems when mounted or
located near the bottommost portion of the windshield;
Is "near" a defined term under Minnesota law?
techman41973 wrote:
I was pulled over for a different offense and warned
about the GPS.
It's an idiotic law, that I can't find in any other state
than in the RepubliK of Kalifornia.
My van conversion shop owner mounted the alternate GPS mount to a vent with
screws to a board behind. A much better position.
It is not a direct answer to the question, but on the sidelines
I have to agree very much. I have tested various GPS positions,
and windshield suction cup mounts have a whole range of
disadvantages, like blocking the view, being in front of a too
bright background, being too far away, falling off from time to
time, particularly at freezing temperatures, not cooling the
device like mounts in front of air vents, keeping the device in
direct sunlight, etc., etc.
Hans-Georg
California changed the law on mounting a GPS unit on your windshield, butthe law still seems complicated and limits your options. (12) A portable Global Positioning System (GPS), which may be mounted in a seven-inch squarein the lower corner of the windshield farthest removed from the driver or in a five-inch square in the lower corner of the windshield nearest to the driver and outside of an airbag deployment zone, if the system is used onlyfor door-to-door navigation while the motor vehicle is being operated. http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc26708.htm http://www.ehow.com/about_6513133_california-gps-windshield-law.html http://www.ehow.com/facts_7419344_california-law-gps-window-locations.html How many of you use a GPS device and mount it using a suction-cup windshield mount? Where on the windshield doyou mount your unit? Have you ever been warned or fined by police? Thanks
Doesn't mounting it on your air vent tend to break the air vent eventually? I have an old Mercedes that I want to keep in pristine shape, and I'm afraid to break a fin on the vent if I mount a phone on it.
If you know a mounting kit that seems like it would not hurt the air vent, I'd love to know which brand, model, and where to buy one.