Bush to consider shutting down GPS in extreme emergency

Discussion in 'General GPS Discussion' started by Fred, Dec 16, 2004.

  1. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    You can be in the middle of the Empty Quarter and still do it with GPS
    alone.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 18, 2004
  2. Fred

    Alan White Guest

    By definition, when he became President.
     
    Alan White, Dec 18, 2004
  3. Fred

    Alan Browne Guest

    Mxsmanic wrote:

    The average is an increasingly accurate position, but it is not your _true_
    position.
     
    Alan Browne, Dec 18, 2004
  4. Fred

    Stan Gosnell Guest

    The Aviation Trust Fund currently has a multi-billion dollar surplus.
    But it is being used as an offset for the rest of the deficit, so it's
    not being spent at the rate it should. But there are many small airports
    getting improvements. Plus, IMO, a precision approach with high minimums
    is better than a non-precision approach with the same minimums. Dive-
    and-drive is dangerous.
     
    Stan Gosnell, Dec 19, 2004
  5. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    No. The President is a civilian, even as CinC of the military.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  6. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    Yes, but it still had to be placed horizontally, and GPS units at the
    surface were used for that. I'm not sure how the depth was surveyed;
    even at the surface, GPS is not very good at measuring altitude with
    precision (nor was it designed to be).
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  7. The day of his inaugarition. He is Commander-in-Chief of the whole
    armed forces, wether they like it or not.


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  8. For the channel tunnel? You realise that the surface is called the
    "British Channel", and is a rather large body of water?
    Rubbish. You don't need GPS to dig a straight tunnel - you need
    something that projects a straight line, for example a laser. Which is
    exactly what they used.

    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  9. And because they are unknown, you can't proof that they won't justify
    the drawbacks. QED.


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  10. But it's not your true position, only an approximation.


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  11. Hint: Spirit levels aren't rocket science anymore. They might have used
    GPS to survey the start points, though that wouldn't be strictly
    necessary, but they sure as hell didn't need GPS when they started
    digging the tunnel itself.

    Please get a clue - tunnels are below ground, and you DON'T go digging
    vertical shafts every hundred meters to fix your position with GPS,
    especially if the vertical shaft would have to pass through hundreds of
    feets of rock and large body of water...


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  12. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    He remains a civilian.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  13. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    Yes. Opaque to both GPS signals and light.
    There are thousands of references that say they used GPS, so unless
    there is a vast conspiracy to conceal the real methods used, GPS was it.

    Lasers don't penetrate the waters of the Channel or the rock below any
    better than GPS signals do.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  14. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    I meant horizontally in terms of east, west, south, and north.
    Horizontal positioning in the GPS sense, latitude and longitude.
    GPS made sure that the tunnel was still on the planned path.
    You don't have a line of sight for lasers or visual surveying through
    water and rock, either.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  15. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    I don't have to. The burden of proof is on the person who feels it is
    necessary to shut off GPS. The dangers of doing so are apparent in
    abundance, but the advantage has not yet been shown, or even described.
    I think not. Nothing has been demonstrated, and that's just the
    problem.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  16. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    What other true positions do you have in mind?
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
  17. Take a trip to Greenwich. Stand on the Meridian. Turn on your GPS
    receiver. Note that it won't show exactly 0°, even though you're
    standing on the exact line that DEFINES the 0° Meridian.


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  18. Unimportant for a tunnel. You plan which direction you dig in, and
    check wether you are digging straight.
    No. GPS doesn't work underground - period.
    Because the lasers were used to sight through the tunnel, not through
    the rock. You place a laser at the start of the tunnel, and if you can
    still see it at your end of the tunnel the tunnel is more or less
    straight.

    Just how do you think people built tunnels like that? Do you think they dig a trench and drop the concrete tubes in from above? Some tunnels ARE built like that, and in that case GPS would be usefull, but that's not how the Eurotunnel was built, that method only works for small tunnels that cross shallow rivers.


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  19. That's a price understatement...
    Maybe you should read up on what a "tunnel" is before you make a fool
    of yourself.


    Juergen Nieveler
     
    Juergen Nieveler, Dec 19, 2004
  20. Fred

    Mxsmanic Guest

    I read up on how the Chunnel was surveyed and constructed, and thus
    avoided making a fool of myself in advance.
     
    Mxsmanic, Dec 19, 2004
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
There are no similar threads yet.
Loading...